mrkeyoor.com_
Tue 01 Sept 17:40 UTC
Dev Toolsevaluationupdated 27 Aug 2026

codex-plugin-cc review

Codex Plugin for Claude Code lets you run Codex reviews and delegated coding tasks from a Claude Code session. It keeps the handoff, job status, and results inside Claude Code while using the Codex CLI already installed on your machine.

+226stars / 7d
Verdict

Our sandbox installed 3 packages in 16 seconds and passed all 91 tests, but the build stopped after 9 seconds because the codex command was unavailable. Use this plugin if Claude Code is already your daily workspace and a second-agent review or resumable Codex handoff is worth the extra local machinery. Keep the optional Stop-hook gate out of release policy until its current fail-open report is resolved and verified on your setup.

We ran it

Lab card: what happened when we ran codex-plugin-ccScreenshot of codex-plugin-cc (github.com/openai/codex-plugin-cc)
Install✓ · 16s3 packages · 27 MB
Build✗ · 9s
Tests✓ · 57s91 passed · 0 failed of 91 (node:test)
Known vulns00 critical · 0 high · 0 moderate · 0 low (npm audit)
Repo63 files~9,397 lines of source · 0.4 MB · 1 CI workflows · tests dir

Answers from our run

Does codex-plugin-cc build from source?

Dependencies installed in 16 seconds (3 packages), and the build failed. We cloned commit db52e28 into a clean Debian container with 3 CPUs and no project-specific setup.

Do codex-plugin-cc's tests pass?

Yes: 91 of 91 passed when we ran the project's own test command (node:test). Some failures need services or credentials a bare container does not have.

Does codex-plugin-cc have known vulnerabilities in its dependencies?

npm audit found none in the dependency tree at the time of our run.

Who should not use codex-plugin-cc?

Developers who do not use Claude Code: the README packages the project around Claude Code commands, hooks, agents, and its plugin marketplace.

What are the alternatives to codex-plugin-cc?

Codex CLI, Claude Code. Our sandbox installed 3 packages in 16 seconds and passed all 91 tests, but the build stopped after 9 seconds because the codex command was unavailable.

Setup3/5Install passed; source build also needs the Codex CLI
Docs5/5Commands, login, config, job flow, and gate warning are clear
Community4/532,430 stars and issue activity through August 27, 2026
Maturity3/591 tests pass, while gate and background-job defects remain open

Discussed on

  1. hnCodex Plugin for Claude Code7 points

Who it’s for

Claude Code users who want a second coding agent available in the same repository session.
Developers who want read-only review or a focused adversarial pass before shipping.
Users who need long Codex tasks to continue in the background and remain resumable.
Teams comfortable managing both Claude Code and local Codex authentication and usage limits.

Who it’s NOT for

Developers who do not use Claude Code: the README packages the project around Claude Code commands, hooks, agents, and its plugin marketplace.
Teams treating the optional review gate as a release control: open issue 684 reports a fresh-session path where setup says the gate is enabled while the Stop hook reads another state location and stays inactive.
Windows users running Claude Code from Git Bash with the Microsoft Store PowerShell stub: issue 336 reports Codex shell calls failing and the resulting review becoming a no-op on that setup.
Anyone expecting unattended background rescue to be settled across platforms: issue 686 documents duplicate wait loops that kept macOS tasks alive after the Codex work had ended.
Users with tight model budgets who cannot watch review loops: the README warns that the Stop-hook gate may run for a long time and consume usage limits quickly.

Setup reality

Our sandbox install succeeded in 16 seconds, adding 3 packages and using 27 MB on disk. The build failed with exit 127 after 9 seconds: its prebuild called codex app-server generate-ts, then the shell reported codex: not found. Tests finished in 57 seconds with 91 passed and 0 failed out of 91. Npm audit found 0 known vulnerabilities.

Normal use needs Node.js 18.18 or later, Claude Code, a local Codex CLI, and Codex authentication through a ChatGPT subscription or OpenAI API key. The plugin uses the same local login, configuration, checkout, and usage limits as Codex itself.

There is no Dockerfile, and the useful path is a plugin install inside a real Claude Code environment. Background tasks and the optional review gate depend on local hooks and state, so test those flows on the operating systems and worktree layout your team actually uses.

Eight commands bring Codex into Claude Code

The plugin documents 8 slash commands: review, adversarial review, rescue, transfer, setup, status, result, and cancel. A normal review inspects uncommitted work or compares a branch with a base reference. Adversarial review accepts a focus prompt and questions a chosen design or risk area. Rescue sends investigation or implementation work to a Codex-backed subagent.

Background mode is the main reason to add the bridge instead of opening another terminal. A Codex job can continue while Claude Code remains available, and the status, result, and cancel commands manage it. Finished jobs retain a Codex session ID. Transfer can import the current Claude Code conversation into a persistent Codex thread, which saves you from retelling a long debugging history.

The local Codex CLI supplies the runtime and account

Node.js 18.18 or later is required, along with Claude Code and Codex access through a ChatGPT subscription or OpenAI API key. The plugin does not run a separate hosted Codex service. It calls the global codex binary and reuses that installation's authentication, user configuration, project configuration, repository checkout, and machine environment.

Setup happens through Claude Code's plugin marketplace, followed by /codex:setup. If Codex is missing and npm is present, setup may offer to install it. Project-level .codex/config.toml settings apply only when Codex trusts the project, so model and reasoning choices can differ between repositories. Usage also counts against the same Codex limits you already have.

What happened when we ran it

Our run at commit db52e28 installed 3 npm packages in 16 seconds and used 27 MB on disk. The checkout itself held 63 files, about 9,397 lines of source, and occupied 0.4 MB. Npm audit reported 0 known vulnerabilities: 0 critical, 0 high, 0 moderate, and 0 low.

The build failed with exit code 127 after 9 seconds. Its prebuild created a generated-types directory and invoked codex app-server generate-ts. The log then said sh: 1: codex: not found. That message proves the executable was absent from our sandbox; it does not establish anything beyond that. A source build therefore needs the Codex command available before TypeScript compilation starts.

Tests ran separately and finished in 57 seconds. Node's test runner reported 91 passed and 0 failed out of 91. The repository has a tests directory and 1 CI workflow file, with no Dockerfile. Those results cover the checked-out JavaScript logic in our 3-CPU, 8 GB Debian container. They do not exercise a signed-in Claude Code session talking to a signed-in Codex runtime.

The Stop-hook gate can report success while staying inactive

The optional review gate asks Codex to review Claude's response when a Stop hook fires. If Codex finds a problem, Claude is supposed to continue working. The README warns that this can create a long Claude and Codex loop and consume usage limits quickly, which makes active supervision part of the feature rather than an optional precaution.

Open issue 684 describes a sharper failure on plugin version 1.0.6. After installation and reload during an existing session, setup can write the enabled flag under a temporary state root while the Stop hook reads a plugin-data root. Setup reports success, yet the gate stays inactive. A quality gate that may fail open is unsuitable as the only release check until the path is fixed and retested.

Background rescue and Windows shells have open failures

Issue 686 records 5 stuck background tasks over 2 days on macOS, plus an isolated case where 2 sibling wait loops kept matching each other after the Codex process ended. The reporter did not claim a clean-profile deterministic reproduction. The mechanism and observed session still matter if you expect rescue jobs to run unattended, especially because cleanup failures are easy to overlook.

Windows has a different report. Issue 336 describes Claude Code running from Git Bash on Windows 11, with the Microsoft Store pwsh.exe stub selected for Codex shell calls. Every attempted local Git command failed with error 1312, and the review returned approval without inspecting the changes. That setup needs a real trial before anyone trusts the review result.

Model selection has a smaller current snag. Issue 687 shows the documented spark alias failing for review and adversarial review while the full model identifier succeeds on the same ChatGPT account. Rescue normalizes the alias, but those 2 review paths pass the short name through. The full model ID is a practical workaround, though the alias should behave consistently.

July code and release dates sit beside August issue work

GitHub reported 32,430 stars and 439 open issues and pull requests when fetched. The latest release was v1.0.6 on July 8, 2026, and the repository's last-push field showed the same date. Issue and pull-request updates continued through August 27, including proposed fixes for background waits, state handling, and review aliases. The combined open count is not a bug count.

That split matters for judging health. The July push date alone looks quiet, while the August queue shows active testing and proposed changes around real integrations. The plugin is easiest to recommend as a human-supervised convenience for people already paying the mental and account cost of both tools. Run Codex directly if session transfer, slash commands, and Claude-side background control do not save you time.

Alternatives

ProjectWhat it isPick it when
Codex CLI gh↗OpenAI's coding agent runs directly in a terminal without the Claude Code bridge.pick this instead when you are happy to work in Codex and do not need Claude Code commands, hooks, or transcript transfer.
Claude Code gh↗Anthropic's terminal coding agent is the host environment that this plugin extends.pick this instead when one coding agent is enough and fewer local processes and authentication layers matter more than a second-model review.

What people are saying

  1. [github-trending] openai/codex-plugin-cc

Sources

  1. Codex Plugin for Claude Code repository and README
  2. Codex Plugin for Claude Code v1.0.6 release
  3. Review gate state-path issue 684
  4. Windows PowerShell shell-call issue 336
  5. Background rescue wait-loop issue 686
  6. Review model-alias issue 687

More dev tools reviews

workmux · v2rayNG · SecLists · hashcat · eslint · fastfetch · the whole board →