mrkeyoor.com_
Tue 08 Sept 16:10 UTC
LLM Toolsevaluationupdated 08 Sept 2026

chat-on-steroids review

Chat On Steroids is an Electron desktop app and local MCP server that lets ChatGPT read files, patch code, run shell commands, retain transcripts, and coordinate worker chats on your computer. It closes the gap between a browser conversation and local development tools, with approved folders and per-capability switches defining what ChatGPT may do.

Verdict

Our 60-second install and 14-second build worked, but 1 of 3,184 tests failed, so Chat On Steroids 2.0.7 is a credible beta for developers who specifically want browser ChatGPT to operate a local workspace. Its permission switches and local records are thoughtful, yet the unsigned apps, extension pairing, workspace limits, and browser automation make it a poor default for managed or unattended systems. Try it on a separate project before granting command or desktop control.

We ran it

Lab card: what happened when we ran chat-on-steroidsScreenshot of chat-on-steroids (github.com/totec448-spec/chat-on-steroids)
Install✓ · 60s412 packages · 344 MB
Build✓ · 14s
Tests✗ · 173s3083 passed · 1 failed · 100 skipped of 3184 (vitest)
Known vulns00 critical · 0 high · 0 moderate · 0 low (npm audit)
Repo346 files~151,541 lines of source · 9.4 MB · 3 CI workflows · tests dir

Answers from our run

Does chat-on-steroids build from source?

Dependencies installed in 60 seconds (412 packages), and the build succeeded in 14 seconds. We cloned commit b6cdb61 into a clean Debian container with 3 CPUs and no project-specific setup.

Do chat-on-steroids's tests pass?

Not all of them: 3083 of 3184 passed and 1 failed when we ran the project's own test command (vitest). Some failures need services or credentials a bare container does not have.

Does chat-on-steroids have known vulnerabilities in its dependencies?

npm audit found none in the dependency tree at the time of our run.

Who should not use chat-on-steroids?

ChatGPT Pro users who need file writes or command execution through the connector: the README says Pro is limited to read and fetch, while full MCP write actions are in beta for Business, Enterprise, and Edu.

What are the alternatives to chat-on-steroids?

OpenAI Codex, OpenHands, Codex ChatGPT Pro Plugin. Our 60-second install and 14-second build worked, but 1 of 3,184 tests failed, so Chat On Steroids 2.

Setup2/5Build is quick; app, extension, tunnel, and workspace setup is involved
Docs5/5Permissions, tunnels, platforms, and browser limits are stated plainly
Community3/51,586 stars and active issues, but the repository is weeks old
Maturity2/5Version 2.0.7 remains beta, unsigned, and browser-dependent

Who it’s for

Developers with a ChatGPT Business, Enterprise, or Edu workspace who want write-capable MCP tools inside the browser.
People who want local transcripts, context handoffs, and reusable worker chats tied to their existing ChatGPT account.
Windows or macOS users who can review powerful file, shell, and optional desktop permissions before each project.
Tinkerers willing to maintain a tray app, a matching browser extension, and an MCP tunnel.

Who it’s NOT for

ChatGPT Pro users who need file writes or command execution through the connector: the README says Pro is limited to read and fetch, while full MCP write actions are in beta for Business, Enterprise, and Edu.
Linux users who need mouse, keyboard, or screen control: the README says Linux gets Core tools but has no Desktop computer-control backend.
Teams that require publisher-signed desktop software: version 2.0.7 is beta, Windows and macOS builds are unsigned, and macOS packages are not notarized.
Headless or Firefox-only workflows: the supported setup requires Chrome 116 or newer, or current Edge, plus a companion extension and a signed-in ChatGPT tab.
Anyone who cannot accept browser-UI automation as a dependency: the README calls it an undocumented automation path, and issue 42 reports that tab switching can interfere with operation.

Setup reality

Our sandbox installed 412 npm packages in 60 seconds and used 344 MB. The build succeeded in 14 seconds. Tests ended with exit 1 after 173 seconds: Vitest reported 3,083 passed, 1 failed, and 100 skipped out of 3,184. The log tail showed the totals, but not the failed assertion or its cause. Npm audit found 0 known vulnerabilities.

Using the app requires an approved local folder, a supported ChatGPT workspace with Developer mode, a Chrome or Edge companion extension, and an MCP tunnel. The recommended OpenAI tunnel route also needs a restricted platform credential and tunnel ID. OpenRouter or another compatible API is optional for API-generated plans and follow-ups.

The app runs with your logged-in account's authority. Linux needs a Secret Service keyring and has no Desktop control. Version 2.0.7 builds are unsigned, macOS packages are not notarized, and the Linux AppImage can fall back to Chromium's --no-sandbox mode when user namespaces are disabled. App and extension versions must match.

Version 2.0.7 gives browser ChatGPT nine local Core tools

Chat On Steroids turns a normal ChatGPT conversation into a controller for a local Electron app. Its Core connector exposes nine documented tools for reading, searching, patching, running commands, collecting terminal output, saving artifacts, inspecting sessions, and managing workers. Approved folders limit file operations, while switches can withdraw individual capabilities or put the app into read-only mode. The useful distinction is that commands are not contained by those folders: exec_command starts inside an approved directory and then runs with the privileges of your logged-in user.

Version 2.0.7 also records tool calls and their actual results, keeps transcripts for 30 days by default, and can move a long session into a fresh ChatGPT conversation. Worker chats are ordinary conversations opened in browser tabs. A prime chat can run as many as 8 workers, with 2 enabled by default, then put finished workers to sleep and wake them later. This is attractive if ChatGPT is already where you work and losing tool history to the context window is a recurring annoyance.

The 344 MB install is easier than connecting the product

Our sandbox installed 412 npm packages in 60 seconds and occupied 344 MB. The source build completed in another 14 seconds. Those figures make the repository approachable for an Electron application, and npm audit reported 0 known vulnerabilities in the installed dependency set. The checkout itself contained 346 files and about 151,541 lines of source at commit b6cdb61, so understanding every permission and recovery path is a larger job than the quick build suggests.

A usable desktop setup has several moving pieces. You install the app, approve a project folder, create an OpenAI Secure MCP Tunnel or another HTTPS tunnel, register the custom app in ChatGPT, load the matching Chrome extension, and verify that traffic reaches each hop. Full write actions depend on a Business, Enterprise, or Edu workspace with Developer mode enabled. The README says Pro access is limited to read and fetch. Organizations may also need an administrator to allow custom MCP apps.

What happened when we ran it

Our run installed 412 packages in 60 seconds, built successfully in 14 seconds, and entered the Vitest suite without a setup error. After 173 seconds, the test command returned exit code 1. Vitest counted 3,083 passing tests, 1 failure, and 100 skips out of 3,184 tests across 125 files. That is close to clean, but a release candidate still needs a completely passing command or a documented reason for excluding a case.

The supplied log tail does not identify the failed test, assertion, or cause. It only shows 1 failed file, 121 passing files, 3 skipped files, and the aggregate test totals. Guessing that the container lacked a service or desktop facility would go beyond the evidence. Three CI workflow files and a large test directory are good maintenance signals, while the absent Dockerfile means the repository does not provide a container recipe matching our Debian run.

Linux has Core tools but no Desktop control

Version 2.0.7 supports Windows, macOS 13 or newer, and current desktop Linux on x64 and ARM64. Screen, mouse, and keyboard tools work on Windows and optionally on macOS after Screen Recording and Accessibility grants. Linux receives the Core file and command tools only. It also needs a Secret Service keyring because the app refuses Electron's unencrypted fallback for stored secrets, a sensible refusal that can complicate minimal window-manager setups and remote desktops.

Package trust needs a deliberate decision. Windows and macOS releases are not publisher-signed, macOS is not notarized, and the project tells users to verify SHA-256 hashes before bypassing operating-system warnings. Debian and Ubuntu users are steered toward the DEB. On systems that disable unprivileged user namespaces, the AppImage launcher may start Chromium with --no-sandbox. Security teams that ban that fallback should package or deploy the DEB instead.

The browser extension is the weakest operational dependency

Open issue 42 describes tab switching or newly opened tabs interfering with operation because the extension uses the person's normal browser profile. Issue 104 reports that a Business user on macOS ARM64 could not load account model choices even after reloading the matching extension. These are individual reports rather than measured failure rates, but both concern the browser bridge that enables session attribution, worker chats, model discovery, and context handoffs. Core tools remain available without that bridge, while the features that distinguish this app do not.

The README is frank about the boundary. The MCP connector follows ChatGPT's documented Developer mode, while the extension observes rendered conversation state and types into browser tabs through an undocumented automation path. OpenAI policy changes, DOM changes, account differences, and rate limits can therefore affect behavior outside the repository's control. Issue 111 gives a smaller example: in version 2.0.7, download_artifact rejected a built-in ImageGen download because its host was outside the tool's allowlist.

A September 8 push shows activity, while beta risks remain

GitHub recorded the last push on September 8, 2026, one day after the v2.0.7 release. The repository had 1,586 stars and 23 open issues and pull requests when fetched. It was created on August 22, 2026, so the fast release pace and active queue show attention, not a long operating record. The three CI workflows and checksum publication process are useful signs, but the project itself still labels the product beta and says package checks do not prove overnight browser or device stability.

Chat On Steroids makes sense for a developer who sees the ChatGPT web app as the main interface and wants stronger local tools without moving conversations elsewhere. The 60-second install is a fair trial cost; the real commitment is accepting an unsigned desktop app, matching its extension after upgrades, maintaining a tunnel, and granting high-impact permissions. Start with read-only access to a disposable repository, then enable patching or commands only after the exact tool surface fits your risk tolerance.

Alternatives

ProjectWhat it isPick it when
OpenAI Codex gh↗A terminal coding agent that works directly in a local checkout.pick this instead when you want a supported command-line coding workflow without automating ChatGPT browser tabs.
OpenHands gh↗A self-hostable platform for software-development agents and delegated tasks.pick this instead when you want an agent platform with its own runtime rather than an extension around your ChatGPT session.
Codex ChatGPT Pro PluginA Codex skill that sends selected work to ChatGPT Pro in isolated browser threads.pick this instead when Codex is your primary agent and ChatGPT Pro is a specialist it should call.

What people are saying

  1. [velocity-scout] totec448-spec/chat-on-steroids

Sources

  1. Chat On Steroids README
  2. Chat On Steroids 2.0.7 release
  3. Issue 42: detached browser request
  4. Issue 104: model picker failure
  5. Issue 111: ImageGen artifact download rejection

More llm tools reviews

gpt4free · openai-agents-python · notfair-plugin · freecad-mcp · my-free-code · claude-cookbooks · the whole board →