mrkeyoor.com_
Sat 31 Oct 09:54 UTC
AI Toolsevaluationupdated 02 Oct 2026

skills review

Anthropic Skills is a public collection of instruction folders, scripts, and examples that teach Claude how to handle repeatable jobs. It gives developers working patterns for document creation, design, testing, API work, and building their own skills without starting from an empty file.

+1,559stars / 7d
Verdict

Our sandbox installed 39 packages in 23 seconds and built successfully, yet pytest collected 0 tests, so Anthropic Skills is useful source material rather than a pre-validated toolkit. Use it to study or adopt one skill whose scripts, permissions, and license you have checked. Do not install the catalog wholesale and assume the publisher's name replaces your own fixtures.

We ran it

Lab card: what happened when we ran skillsScreenshot of skills (github.com/anthropics/skills)
Install✓ · 23s39 packages · 190 MB
Build✓ · 13s
Tests✗ · 8s0 passed · 0 failed of 0 (pytest)
Known vulns0(pip-audit)
Repo430 files~19,701 lines of source · 11.7 MB · 0 CI workflows · tests dir

Answers from our run

Does skills build from source?

Dependencies installed in 23 seconds (39 packages), and the build succeeded in 13 seconds. We cloned commit 8a1541c into a clean Debian container with 3 CPUs and no project-specific setup.

Do skills's tests pass?

No. The project's own test command finished in 8 seconds and reported 0 passed, 0 failed (pytest).

Does skills have known vulnerabilities in its dependencies?

pip-audit found none in the dependency tree at the time of our run.

Who should not use skills?

Teams seeking one uniformly open-source package: the README says the DOCX, PDF, PPTX, and XLSX skills are source available rather than open source.

What are the alternatives to skills?

OpenAI Skills, Skills CLI, Superpowers. Our sandbox installed 39 packages in 23 seconds and built successfully, yet pytest collected 0 tests, so Anthropic Skills is useful source material rather than a pre-validated toolkit.

Setup4/523-second install, but each skill brings its own runtime
Docs4/5Clear structure and examples, with per-skill details to inspect
Community4/5Active September push, 179k stars, and 1,392 open items
Maturity3/5Official examples, but no release line or collected GIF tests

Who it’s for

Claude Code users who want official examples they can inspect before installing.
Teams writing internal skills for recurring document, design, or engineering work.
Agent developers studying how SKILL.md, scripts, and reference files fit together.
Evaluators willing to test each selected skill against their own files and permission limits.

Who it’s NOT for

Teams seeking one uniformly open-source package: the README says the DOCX, PDF, PPTX, and XLSX skills are source available rather than open source.
Buyers who need supported production components: Anthropic labels the repository as demonstration and educational material and warns that Claude's behavior may differ.
Release processes that require a repository-wide green test signal: our pytest run collected 0 tests, and the checkout had 0 CI workflow files.
Windows users mixing Claude Desktop marketplace refreshes with Claude Code who cannot tolerate plugin outages: open issue 1943 reports conflicting manifests on that setup.
Developers who need tagged upgrade boundaries: GitHub returned no latest release for the repository.

Setup reality

Our Python 3.12 sandbox installed 39 packages in 23 seconds and used 190 MB. The build succeeded in 13 seconds. Tests failed with exit 5 after 8 seconds: pytest reported 0 passed and 0 failed out of 0, and the log ended with no tests ran in 0.00s. pip-audit found 0 known vulnerabilities.

The measured slack-gif-creator skill needs Pillow, imageio, imageio-ffmpeg, and NumPy. It creates a local GIF, so it needs no Slack credential or hosted service. Claude Code installation instead requires adding the repository as a plugin marketplace and choosing the document or example bundle.

The 430-file checkout occupied 11.7 MB and contained about 19,701 source lines. It had a tests directory, but no CI workflow file or Dockerfile. Other skills can call different scripts and tools, so the 190 MB GIF environment is not a size estimate for the whole catalog.

The 19 folders share a format while their runtimes vary

The 430-file checkout at commit 8a1541c contains 19 top-level skill folders. Each starts with SKILL.md, where a name and description tell Claude when to load the instructions. Some stop at guidance. Others include Python or JavaScript, templates, schemas, fonts, and reference files. That makes the repository useful for learning the format, but it does not give the catalog one shared runtime or one setup command.

At about 19,701 lines of source, the checkout occupied 11.7 MB. The range is wide: there are compact instructions for brand or communication work, plus larger document skills for DOCX, PDF, PPTX, and XLSX files. The repository also includes a basic template and the Agent Skills specification. Read the folder you want, because the root README cannot describe every program a skill may run.

Claude Code installs 2 bundles before task-specific setup begins

The 430-file repository's README gives Claude Code 2 install choices: document-skills and example-skills. You first add anthropics/skills as a marketplace, then install the bundle you want. Paid Claude.ai plans already expose the examples, while API users follow the Skills API route. Those are convenient entry points, but installation only makes the instructions available. It does not prove that every local dependency or output path works on your machine.

The measured GIF skill shows the second layer. Its requirements file names 4 packages: Pillow, imageio, imageio-ffmpeg, and NumPy. The prose install snippet lists only 3 and omits imageio-ffmpeg. No Slack token is needed because the code writes a GIF rather than uploading one. Another folder may need office software, browser control, input documents, or service credentials, so permissions should be reviewed skill by skill.

What happened when we ran it

We measured the Python project in skills/slack-gif-creator at commit 8a1541c. Installing 39 packages took 23 seconds and left 190 MB on disk. The build completed in 13 seconds. pip-audit reported 0 known vulnerabilities. Our measurement setup was a fresh Python 3.12 Debian container with 3 CPUs, 8 GB of RAM, no secrets, and no elevated privileges.

The test step in our run failed with exit 5 after 8 seconds. Pytest reported 0 passed and 0 failed out of 0, then ended with no tests ran in 0.00s. That is neither a broken assertion nor a passing suite. The repository contained a tests directory, but the invoked command collected no cases. We cannot turn an empty run into evidence that the GIF helpers or the other 18 skills behave correctly.

The GIF helper checks dimensions but leaves output judgment to you

The 4-package Slack GIF skill provides a builder, easing functions, frame helpers, and a validator. Its documented target is 128 by 128 pixels for emoji and 480 by 480 for message GIFs, with 10 to 30 frames per second. The builder can reduce colors, remove near-duplicate frames, and resize for emoji use. You still write the animation logic, which is a better fit for custom work than for anyone expecting a gallery of finished assets.

The validator's pass result is based on dimensions. It reports file size, frame count, duration, and estimated frame rate, but is_slack_ready returns the dimension check. That distinction matters when a tool name sounds broader than its decision. The skill itself recommends keeping emoji animation under 3 seconds and using 48 to 128 colors, so a production check should enforce your chosen size and duration limits instead of relying on one Boolean.

Four document skills use different terms from the open examples

The root README says many skills are available under Apache 2.0, then separates the DOCX, PDF, PPTX, and XLSX folders as source available. GitHub supplies no repository-wide license identifier. Copying one of those folders into a company toolkit therefore starts with its local license file, not with an assumption about the organization or the rest of the tree. Anthropic also labels every skill here as demonstration and educational material.

Open issue 1943 adds a current installation warning. The reporter used Claude Desktop 2.16120.0 on Windows 11 with Claude Code 2.1.286 and saw conflicting plugin manifests after marketplace refreshes. Six refreshes reportedly reproduced the problem for three installed plugins at commit 8a1541c; updating from the CLI restored them until the next refresh. This is one reported environment, not proof that every install fails, but affected Windows teams should test refresh behavior before rollout.

A September 29 push shows activity despite 1,392 open items

GitHub recorded 179,344 stars and a last push on September 29, 2026. On October 2, the open queue split into 390 issues and 1,002 pull requests. Recent issue and pull-request updates show that people are still reporting, proposing, and merging work. GitHub returned no latest release, however, so adopters cannot use a tagged release line as their upgrade boundary. Pin a commit and review the diff when moving it.

The practical purchase decision is narrow. A 23-second install and 13-second build make the GIF example easy to inspect, while 0 collected tests leave its behavior for you to prove. Choose one skill, audit every script and permission it can reach, then add fixtures around the outputs your team cares about. If you need a catalog that arrives with repository-wide CI and versioned releases, this one does not meet that bar.

Alternatives

ProjectWhat it isPick it when
OpenAI Skills gh↗A public catalog of reusable skills built for Codex.pick this instead when Codex is your target agent and you want examples made for its skill loader.
Skills CLI gh↗A command-line installer and manager for skills across many coding agents.pick this instead when distributing and updating skills across agents matters more than Anthropic's example content.
Superpowers gh↗An agent skill set organized around a software-development method.pick this instead when you want an opinionated planning, testing, and debugging workflow.

What people are saying

  1. [velocity-scout] wenziai/wenzi-xhs-agent-skills
  2. [github-trending] ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills
  3. [techcrunch-ai] Google is killing off Gemini’s Gems in favor of ‘skills’
  4. [velocity-scout] VoltAgent/awesome-openclaw-skills
  5. [github-trending] vercel-labs/agent-skills
  6. [velocity-scout] zhuyansen/awesome-claude-video-skills

Sources

  1. Anthropic Skills repository
  2. Measured commit 8a1541c
  3. Slack GIF Creator skill
  4. Slack GIF Creator validator
  5. Claude Desktop marketplace refresh issue

More ai tools reviews

KiroCrew · Orkas · hypit · Paradev · see-through · Resume-Matcher · the whole board →