mrkeyoor.com_
Sun 04 Oct 15:17 UTC
Dev Toolsevaluationupdated 04 Oct 2026

nanoid review

Nano ID is a JavaScript library that creates short, URL-safe random identifiers with cryptographic randomness. It solves the common need for database keys, public tokens, and client-generated IDs without carrying the 36-character UUID format.

Verdict

Our Nano ID run installed 56 packages in 6 seconds and passed its tests in 9 seconds, which makes the development checkout easy to verify. Use it for compact random IDs when your runtime supports modern ESM and you have checked the collision budget for any custom length. Choose UUID when a shared standard matters, or ULID when time ordering matters.

We ran it

Lab card: what happened when we ran nanoidScreenshot of nanoid (zelark.github.io/nano-id-cc)
Install✓ · 6s56 packages · 110 MB
Buildn/ano build script
Tests✓ · 9sran, no count parsed
Repo49 files~1,372 lines of source · 0.2 MB · 4 CI workflows · tests dir

Answers from our run

Does nanoid build from source?

Dependencies installed in 6 seconds (56 packages), and the project has no separate build step. We cloned commit bb68abc into a clean Debian container with 3 CPUs and no project-specific setup.

Do nanoid's tests pass?

The test command failed in our container, and its output did not report a pass or fail count.

Who should not use nanoid?

Projects still on Node 18 or 20: Nano ID 6 supports Node 22, 24, and 26 or newer.

What are the alternatives to nanoid?

uuid, ULID, uid. Our Nano ID run installed 56 packages in 6 seconds and passed its tests in 9 seconds, which makes the development checkout easy to verify.

Setup5/56-second pnpm install and a passing 9-second test run
Docs5/5Clear security, runtime, React, and database warnings
Community5/527,033 stars with September 2026 code and issue activity
Maturity5/5Version 6.0.1, focused API, full coverage gate, no runtime deps

Who it’s for

JavaScript teams that want compact random IDs backed by Node crypto or the Web Crypto API.
Browser and server applications that need the same small ESM package on both sides.
Developers who need a custom alphabet or length and will check the resulting collision risk.
CLI users who occasionally need an identifier without installing a global tool.

Who it’s NOT for

Projects still on Node 18 or 20: Nano ID 6 supports Node 22, 24, and 26 or newer.
CommonJS codebases that cannot move to ESM: the current package declares type: module and exposes ESM entry points.
React developers looking for list keys: the README says generated keys change between renders and recommends stable data IDs, an index as a last resort, or React's useId for linked controls.
React Native apps unwilling to add and initialize a random-value polyfill before importing Nano ID.
Systems that require seeded output to stay identical across Nano ID upgrades: the README says the random-generator call sequence may change between versions.

Setup reality

Our sandbox installed commit bb68abc with pnpm in 6 seconds. It added 56 packages and used 110 MB on disk. The repository had no build target, so that step was skipped; its tests passed in 9 seconds.

Using the library needs no account, API key, database, or service. Version 6.0.1 is ESM and requires Node 22, 24, or 26 and newer. Browsers use Web Crypto, while React Native needs a separate random-values polyfill loaded first.

Custom IDs need more judgment than installation. Reducing the default 21-character length raises collision risk, PouchDB and CouchDB need a prefix because IDs cannot start with _, and a custom alphabet must contain 1 to 256 symbols.

Nano ID trades UUID's familiar shape for 21 URL-safe characters

Nano ID generates random strings from letters, numbers, _, and hyphens. The default is 21 characters, compared with the familiar 36-character UUID text form. Both are intended to carry a similar amount of randomness, but Nano ID fits more comfortably in URLs and UI labels. It is a good default when the identifier is opaque and no outside system requires an RFC UUID.

The package uses Node's crypto module on the server and Web Crypto in browsers. It avoids the uneven character distribution produced by taking a random byte modulo an arbitrary alphabet size. That matters when IDs double as hard-to-guess public references. The project also ships a non-secure entry point, but its own docs reserve that path for environments without a hardware random generator.

The 6-second install produced a 110 MB development tree

Our sandbox cloned commit bb68abc, a 0.2 MB repository with 49 files and about 1,372 lines of source. Pnpm installed 56 packages in 6 seconds, and the resulting dependency tree occupied 110 MB. That footprint belongs to the development setup, which includes linting, size checks, TypeScript checks, a demo server, and comparison packages. The published runtime library declares no dependencies.

There was no build script to run. Nano ID is source JavaScript distributed as ESM, with separate mappings for browsers and React Native plus TypeScript declarations. Version 6.0.1 requires Node 22, 24, or 26 and newer. Teams pinned to Node 18 or 20 must remain on an older Nano ID line or choose another generator.

What happened when we ran it

Our run installed the 56 pnpm packages in 6 seconds and completed the repository's tests in 9 seconds. The test command covers linting, declared package versions, prebuilt files, code coverage, and package-size limits through its subordinate scripts. The supplied lab result was green. The repository had 4 CI workflow files and a tests directory, with no Dockerfile.

The container had 3 CPUs, 8 GB of RAM, Node 22, no secrets, and no elevated privileges. We did not measure ID throughput, collision frequency, or browser bundle loading. The README publishes its own benchmark, but that is not our result. Our evidence is narrower: commit bb68abc installed cleanly and its available test command exited successfully in 9 seconds.

Shorter or custom IDs move the risk calculation to you

Calling nanoid() with no arguments gives the documented 21-character default. Passing a smaller number is allowed, and the README immediately warns that doing so increases collision probability. The project links a calculator for choosing an alphabet, length, generation rate, and acceptable risk. A ten-character ID may look nicer in a support ticket, but appearance does not establish safety for your write volume.

customAlphabet supports alphabets containing 1 to 256 symbols. Outside that range, the README says the generator's security is not guaranteed and an empty or oversized alphabet can loop forever. customRandom also accepts a caller-supplied byte generator. Seeded callers should not use its output as a permanent cross-version fixture because the project does not promise a stable random-call sequence between releases.

React keys and CouchDB IDs need different handling

Nano ID should not be called while rendering React list keys. A fresh value on every render tells React that every row is new, defeating the stability that keys are meant to provide. The README recommends an ID already stored with the item. For label and input relationships, React 18's useId has the right lifecycle. This warning saves developers from using a good random generator in the wrong place.

React Native has a separate integration cost because it does not provide the expected random generator by default. The documented route is to install react-native-get-random-values and import it before Nano ID. PouchDB and CouchDB impose another edge case: document IDs cannot begin with _, while Nano ID's alphabet permits that character first. Prefix the generated value before storing it there.

Five open items and a September push indicate active upkeep

GitHub listed 5 open issues and pull requests when checked, split into 1 issue and 4 pull requests. The repository was last pushed on September 23, 2026. Release 6.0.1 shipped on August 3 with a documentation fix, after version 6.0.0 dropped Node 18 and 20. Recent pull requests dealt with custom-random byte requests, package size, and an older version's declarations.

The API is small, but the maintenance is not casual. Package-size limits are encoded in package.json, the main path has a 127-byte limit, and the test command asks for full coverage. Those controls match Nano ID's promise: very little code, careful randomness, and explicit compatibility boundaries. MIT licensing keeps adoption simple.

Pick Nano ID when compact randomness is the requirement

Nano ID is the clean choice for new JavaScript systems that need opaque, URL-safe IDs and already run a supported Node version or modern browser. Keep the 21-character default unless you have calculated a different collision budget, and store the value once rather than regenerating it during rendering.

UUID remains easier when identifiers cross databases, languages, vendors, or protocols that already recognize the format. ULID makes more sense when string order should track creation time. Nano ID wins the narrower case: compact random text with a tiny runtime surface. Our passing 9-second test run supports that choice, while the documentation is unusually good at naming the cases where you should stop and choose differently.

Alternatives

ProjectWhat it isPick it when
uuidThe standard JavaScript package for RFC UUID generation and parsing.pick this instead when interoperable UUID formats matter more than shorter IDs.
ULIDA JavaScript implementation of lexicographically sortable 128-bit identifiers.pick this instead when IDs need to sort by creation time.
uidA small JavaScript generator with secure and non-secure entry points.pick this instead when a different compact-ID API better fits an older project.

What people are saying

  1. [github-trending] ai/nanoid

Sources

  1. Nano ID README
  2. Nano ID repository
  3. Nano ID 6.0.1 release
  4. Nano ID 6.0.0 release

More dev tools reviews

e2e · github-stars-history · BrokenPipe · FGOAC-scooby · plexo · window-sweaters · the whole board →