mrkeyoor.com_
Mon 28 Sept 00:14 UTC
Automationevaluationupdated 26 Aug 2026

apify-mcp-server review

Apify MCP Server lets an AI assistant find and run Apify's web scrapers, crawlers, and automation jobs as tools. It gives chat and coding clients a common way to collect data from websites, search engines, maps, social networks, and stores without writing a scraper for every request.

+644stars / 7d
Verdict

Our Apify MCP Server run installed 788 packages, then passed its 23-second build and 43-second test step. Use it when an assistant needs controlled access to approved Apify Actors and your team can govern cost, data transfer, and long jobs. Choose a narrower crawler or browser server when a marketplace of paid tools only adds risk.

We ran it

Lab card: what happened when we ran apify-mcp-serverScreenshot of apify-mcp-server (mcp.apify.com)
Install✓ · 43s788 packages · 707 MB
Build✓ · 23s
Tests✓ · 43sran, no count parsed
Repo374 files~49,608 lines of source · 3.4 MB · 14 CI workflows · Dockerfile · tests dir

Answers from our run

Does apify-mcp-server build from source?

Dependencies installed in 43 seconds (788 packages), and the build succeeded in 23 seconds. We cloned commit 91ee491 into a clean Debian container with 3 CPUs and no project-specific setup.

Do apify-mcp-server's tests pass?

The test command failed in our container, and its output did not report a pass or fail count.

Who should not use apify-mcp-server?

Anyone needing a fully local or offline scraper: even the local stdio server sends requests and Actor inputs to the Apify API for execution.

What are the alternatives to apify-mcp-server?

Firecrawl MCP Server, Playwright MCP. Our Apify MCP Server run installed 788 packages, then passed its 23-second build and 43-second test step.

Setup4/5Hosted OAuth is easy; local mode still needs Node, a token, and config
Docs5/5Client, tool, payment, telemetry, and limitation coverage is detailed
Community4/55,055 stars and a same-day release; code PRs are invitation-only
Maturity3/5v0.15.3 is active, while long-run task behavior is unfinished

Who it’s for

Teams already using Apify that want assistants to launch Actors and retrieve their results conversationally.
Claude Code, Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and VS Code users who need web research or structured extraction tools.
Agent builders who value dynamic discovery across the Apify Store and can control which tools are exposed.
Developers willing to pay Actor execution costs and review each Actor's schema, pricing, and data policy.

Who it’s NOT for

Anyone needing a fully local or offline scraper: even the local stdio server sends requests and Actor inputs to the Apify API for execution.
Teams that cannot send target URLs or extracted inputs to Apify: the privacy section says those requests and inputs reach the Apify API.
Users who need full hosted feature parity from stdio: output schema inference and access to rental Actors are limited to the hosted server.
Agents that need dependable 20-to-60-minute jobs today: an open issue documents client tool-call ceilings, polling gaps, and quiet runs losing task-result retrieval, with work deferred until a newer MCP Tasks extension.
Operators retrieving untrusted multi-gigabyte key-value records: an open bug says the current tool buffers the full record before applying its size decision, which can exhaust server memory.
Production teams that leave the default tool set implicit: the README warns defaults may change and recommends an explicit tools list for a stable interface.

Setup reality

Our sandbox installed 788 pnpm packages in 43 seconds and used 707 MB. The build passed in 23 seconds, and the tests passed in 43 seconds. The 3.4 MB monorepo had 374 files, about 49,608 source lines, 14 CI workflows, a Dockerfile, and a tests directory.

Hosted setup needs an Apify account and OAuth or a token. Local stdio requires Node.js 22, an npx client command, and APIFY_TOKEN; Actor inputs still go to Apify for remote execution. Agentic payment paths add wallet or payment-provider setup.

Production users should pin an explicit tool list, set spend limits, choose whether telemetry and Sentry remain enabled, and test pagination. Jobs lasting 20 to 60 minutes need a collection plan because several clients impose tool-call limits.

Thousands of Actors become callable tools

Apify MCP Server lets an AI client discover and run Apify Actors. Actors are hosted jobs for scraping, crawling, extraction, and other automation. The server can search Apify Store, inspect an Actor's input schema, start it, then retrieve results from its dataset or key-value store. One connection can cover web research, map leads, social posts, ecommerce pages, or a custom Actor owned by the user's team.

That range is the advantage over a single crawler server. A model can find a specialist Actor and receive a generated tool schema instead of forcing every site through one generic scraper. Helper tools expose run status, logs, storage, and Apify documentation. Calls return run metadata and a suggested next action rather than placing a whole dataset in the first model response.

Actors have different owners, prices, inputs, runtimes, and output shapes. Dynamic discovery is convenient during exploration, but an unattended agent should not select any paid Actor based on a store search. Review the Actor, pin its identifier, check pricing and data handling, and test its output before exposing it to a production workflow.

What happened when we ran it

Our run at commit 91ee491 installed 788 pnpm packages in 43 seconds and used 707 MB on disk. The build succeeded in 23 seconds, and the supplied tests passed in 43 seconds. Nothing in those steps reported an install, compiler, or test failure. The unprivileged Debian container had 3 CPUs, 8 GB of RAM, Node.js 22, and no secrets.

The 3.4 MB checkout contained 374 files and about 49,608 lines of source. Our scan found a workspace monorepo, 14 CI workflow files, a Dockerfile, and a tests directory. Those are reassuring repository controls. The run did not authenticate with Apify, execute a paid Actor, assess scraped data, or measure a long remote job, so the passing 109 seconds of install, build, and tests should not be read as an end-to-end service benchmark.

Hosted OAuth is easier than local stdio

The recommended path is to add https://mcp.apify.com to a compatible client and complete OAuth. The README lists Claude Desktop, Claude on the web, ChatGPT, Cursor, VS Code, OpenCode, Kiro, and Apify's tester. Bearer tokens work when OAuth is unsuitable. Streamable HTTP is current; the former /sse endpoint has been removed.

Hosted service also gets output-schema inference and access to rental Actors that local stdio does not fully match. Stdio requires Node.js 22, npx @apify/actors-mcp-server, and an APIFY_TOKEN environment variable. It only moves the protocol process onto the user's machine. Requests and Actor inputs still reach the Apify API, and the jobs still execute on Apify infrastructure.

That distinction rules the project out for offline work or policies that prohibit sending target URLs and input data to a third party. Telemetry is enabled by default, and stdio uses Sentry for errors; the README documents how to disable both. Teams should decide that setting before rollout rather than inherit a developer default.

An explicit tool list limits cost and exposure

The default set includes Actor discovery and calling, Apify documentation, and 2 configured Actors, with run and storage helpers injected when execution is present. call-actor can contact external resources, start paid work, and create data that later calls must retrieve. Tool annotations describe behavior, but clients and models do not enforce every annotation identically.

Apify warns that defaults may change and recommends an explicit tools list. A research assistant that needs one approved crawler should receive that Actor plus the minimum result tools, not unrestricted store discovery. Pricing varies by Actor. AGI, direct x402, and Skyfire provide agentic payment routes, but they add balances, wallets, tokens, refund terms, or provider accounts. An ordinary spend-capped Apify token is easier to govern for an initial deployment.

Runs lasting 20 to 60 minutes do not fit every client

Open issue 1119 describes Actors that run for 20 to 60 minutes while several clients impose a roughly 60-second tool-call ceiling. The server caps waiting at 45 seconds. A quiet legacy task can outlive its stored task record, leaving the completed Actor run without retrievable task results. The issue is deferred until the server adopts the MCP Tasks extension, so users should test polling and retention with their exact client or collect long jobs outside chat.

Open issue 1067 documents a separate memory risk. get-key-value-store-record can fetch an entire value before applying its 256 KB inline decision. The report says a multi-GB record could exhaust server memory. Avoid that tool for unbounded binary values until retrieval is capped, and prefer paginated datasets for large results. These are specific reasons to walk away if jobs are routinely long or outputs are uncontrolled.

A same-day release shows active protocol work

GitHub showed 5,055 stars, 142 combined issues and pull requests, and a last push on August 26, 2026. Release v0.15.3 was published the same day with a structured-output schema fix. Issue 1121, previously about output schemas converting poorly to TypeScript, also closed on August 26. The activity is current, though a pre-1.0 server moving with MCP clients still needs version pinning and regression tests.

The README covers hosted and local differences, tool selection, output retrieval, payment, privacy, telemetry, and schema limits in unusual detail. Code contributions are generally restricted to maintainer-invited work, while bug reports and documentation fixes are welcomed. Apify customers get the clearest value: one tested connection to known Actors. Everyone else should compare the 707 MB local dependency footprint and marketplace governance work with a smaller crawler or direct browser tool.

Alternatives

ProjectWhat it isPick it when
Firecrawl MCP Server gh↗An MCP server focused on web search, crawling, scraping, and content extraction.pick this instead when web content extraction is the whole job and you prefer a narrower tool surface over Apify's Actor marketplace.
Playwright MCP gh↗A Microsoft MCP server that lets agents operate a browser through Playwright.pick this instead when the agent must interact with pages directly and you want browser control rather than managed scraping jobs.

What people are saying

  1. [github-trending] apify/apify-mcp-server

Sources

  1. Apify MCP Server README
  2. Apify MCP Server v0.15.3 release
  3. Long-running Actor task issue
  4. Large key-value record memory issue
  5. Actor output schema issue

More automation reviews

runner-images · agent-fleet-manager · kargo · Rose · alchemy · laya · the whole board →